Comparison
NORBU vs. manual demand writing
Manual preparation produces defensible demands — at a cost measured in paralegal hours. This comparison covers the workflow difference, not a claim about quality.
Side by side
Where the workflows diverge.
| Dimension | Manual | NORBU |
|---|---|---|
| Reads complete case file | Yes — by hand | Yes |
| Medical chronology | Manual | Generated, cited |
| Damages reconciliation | Spreadsheet | Line-by-line |
| Indexed exhibits | Manual | Automatic |
| Source citations | Manual | Page-level |
| Missing-document detection | Reviewer dependent | Yes |
| Treatment-gap detection | Reviewer dependent | Yes |
| Demand readiness analysis | Informal | Scored |
| Carrier weakness analysis | Attorney only | Surfaced for review |
| Full package generation | Manual assembly | Complete package |
| Attorney review | Required | Required by design |
| CMS workflow | Existing | Layer around existing |
| Pay-per-demand | n/a | Yes |
NORBU Demand provides analytical support for counsel. It does not determine legal value, predict settlement outcomes, or provide legal advice. Every observation is presented for attorney review.
Test it against your current process.
One file, one readiness review.