Demand Intelligence

The analytical layer beneath the demand.

Every dimension of the submission, evaluated together.

NORBU evaluates the entire demand submission — not just the narrative. Liability, causation, treatment, diagnostics, damages, documentation, exhibits and completeness are analyzed as one connected picture, with each observation tied back to the record.

norbudemand.io / cases / PLD-24-1107 / intelligence

● ANALYSIS COMPLETE

Case

Carter v. Thompson

Motor vehicle · Cobb County, GA · DOL 05·16·24

87

Demand strength

STRONG

Demand readiness

92%

Document completeness

85%

Scores are analytical support for counsel. NORBU does not determine legal value or predict settlement outcomes.

Intelligence categories

Liability Strength91
Causation Strength88
Objective Injury Findings84
Treatment Continuity76
Treatment Gaps62
Diagnostic Support89
Specialist Escalation81
Procedure Severity78
Future Medical Support58
Medical Specials Verification86
Lost Wage Documentation69
Prior Injury / Preexisting Risk74
Missing Documentation65
Contradictions82
Exhibit Completeness85
Demand Readiness92

Eight dimensions

What NORBU analyzes.

Each dimension reports what the record establishes and where it leaves a question open for counsel.

01 · Liability

NORBU reads the incident documentation in the file and reports what the record establishes — and what it leaves unsupported.

  • ·Police and incident report contents
  • ·Documented mechanism of injury
  • ·Scene photographs and property damage evidence
  • ·Witness and party statements present in the file
  • ·Consistency of the incident description across records

02 · Causation

The link between the incident and the treatment is where carriers push hardest. NORBU shows where providers made that link explicit.

  • ·Provider statements connecting findings to the incident
  • ·Symptom onset timing relative to date of loss
  • ·Prior treatment of the same body part
  • ·Intervening events referenced in records

03 · Treatment

Every date of service is sequenced into one continuity picture, with gaps surfaced rather than buried.

  • ·Provider identification and treatment sequence
  • ·Visit density from date of loss to discharge
  • ·Gaps between dates of service
  • ·Referral and specialist escalation chains
  • ·Discharge status and residual complaints

04 · Diagnostics

Imaging and diagnostic studies are extracted with the interpreting provider's own language and page-level citation.

  • ·Imaging studies performed and impressions
  • ·Positive clinical and objective findings
  • ·Studies referenced but absent from the file
  • ·Diagnostic findings supporting documented procedures

05 · Damages

Specials, wage loss and future care are reconciled against the billing record so every figure has a source.

  • ·Billed and adjusted medical specials by provider
  • ·Outstanding balances and liens noted in the file
  • ·Wage documentation and out-of-work periods
  • ·Documented future care recommendations

06 · Documentation

NORBU identifies records referenced inside other records that never made it into the upload.

  • ·Referenced-but-missing reports
  • ·Incomplete record sets by provider
  • ·Unsigned or unfinalized notes
  • ·Billing statements without matching records

07 · Exhibits

Documents are classified, indexed and mapped to the narrative that cites them.

  • ·Document classification by type
  • ·Exhibit ordering and index generation
  • ·Narrative-to-exhibit citation mapping
  • ·Duplicate and near-duplicate pages

08 · Completeness

A composite readiness view for the attorney making the send decision.

  • ·Open issues requiring review
  • ·Unresolved reconciliation items
  • ·Outstanding record requests
  • ·Readiness movement between drafts

Scoring

Sixteen categories, one readiness picture.

Scores are analytical support for counsel. They do not represent a valuation or a prediction.

Liability Strength91
Causation Strength88
Objective Injury Findings84
Treatment Continuity76
Treatment Gaps62
Diagnostic Support89
Specialist Escalation81
Procedure Severity78
Future Medical Support58
Medical Specials Verification86
Lost Wage Documentation69
Prior Injury / Preexisting Risk74
Missing Documentation65
Contradictions82
Exhibit Completeness85
Demand Readiness92

FAQ

Common questions

Does NORBU predict what a case is worth?
No. NORBU does not determine legal value or predict settlement outcomes. Scores describe what the record documents, for attorney review.
What does a demand strength score mean?
It is a composite of the analytical categories evaluated on the file — an indication of how well the documentation supports the demand as drafted.
Is every finding cited?
Entries are reported with the page in the record set they were drawn from, so review is verification rather than re-reading.

← Back to the platform overview

NORBU Demand provides analytical support for counsel. It does not determine legal value, predict settlement outcomes, or provide legal advice. Every observation is presented for attorney review.

See the analysis on your own file.

Upload a case and review strength, readiness and completeness before anything is sent.