The platform
NORBU Demand Intelligence™
Know whether the case is ready before the carrier does.
NORBU doesn't just draft the demand. It analyzes the entire case file, identifies weaknesses, verifies damages, surfaces missing documentation and shows your team what should be fixed before the demand leaves the firm.
norbudemand.io / cases / PLD-24-1107 / intelligence
● ANALYSIS COMPLETE
Case
Carter v. Thompson
Motor vehicle · Cobb County, GA · DOL 05·16·24
Demand strength
STRONG
Demand readiness
92%
Document completeness
85%
Scores are analytical support for counsel. NORBU does not determine legal value or predict settlement outcomes.
Intelligence categories
Category evolution
An AI demand letter generator writes a letter. Demand intelligence reviews the case.
Three approaches to the same deliverable, separated by how much of the file is actually read.
Layer 01
AI demand letter generator
Produces a narrative from summarized inputs.
Layer 02
Demand package automation
Assembles the documents into a package.
Layer 03
Demand intelligence
Analyzes the entire file and reports readiness.
Before You Send™
Fix the case before the carrier finds the weakness.
Every observation is analytical support for attorney review — never legal advice, and never a prediction of outcome.
DEMAND NOT READY
Missing
- MRI report
- Final orthopedic note
- PT discharge summary
- Outstanding provider bill
- Wage verification
Demand readiness
73%
5 ISSUES REQUIRE REVIEW
Analytical observations · for attorney review
- 0123-day treatment gap detected.
- 02Consider documenting the reason for the interruption in treatment.
- 03Future care amount lacks supporting documentation.
- 04Three billing totals do not reconcile with the medical specials summary.
- 05Orthopedic recommendation referenced in the narrative is not included in the exhibits.
Observations are not legal advice. Counsel decides what to address and what to send.
Intelligence categories
Sixteen dimensions, analyzed on every file.
Each category reports what the record contains and what it lacks, cited to the page it came from.
Liability Strength
How clearly the record documents the mechanism of the incident, the responding narrative, scene evidence and statements available in the file.
Causation Strength
Whether treating providers connect the documented findings to the incident, and where the record leaves that connection implicit.
Objective Injury Findings
Imaging impressions, positive clinical tests and objective examination findings located in the records, with page citations.
Treatment Continuity
The density and sequence of visits from date of loss through discharge, and how consistently treatment was maintained.
Treatment Gaps
Intervals between dates of service that a carrier is likely to raise, surfaced with the exact dates on both sides of the gap.
Diagnostic Support
Which diagnostic studies exist in the file, which are referenced but absent, and how findings are described by the interpreting provider.
Specialist Escalation
Referral chains from primary or urgent care into specialty treatment, including who recommended each escalation.
Procedure Severity
Documented injections, surgical procedures and interventions, with the notes and operative reports supporting each.
Future Medical Support
Whether recommendations for future care are documented by a provider or appear only in narrative form.
Medical Specials Verification
Reconciliation of every billed line item against provider statements, ledgers and the specials summary.
Lost Wage Documentation
Employer verification, pay records and out-of-work notes supporting the wage loss claimed in the demand.
Prior Injury / Preexisting Risk
References in the records to prior treatment of the same body part, so counsel can address it before the carrier does.
Missing Documentation
Records referenced inside other documents that are not present in the uploaded file.
Contradictions
Statements across records that do not agree — differing mechanisms, dates, or symptom onset descriptions.
Exhibit Completeness
Whether every document cited in the demand narrative appears in the indexed exhibit set.
Demand Readiness
A composite view of whether the file supports the demand as currently drafted, for attorney review.
Demand economics
Eight mechanical steps become five.
NORBU isn't replacing attorney judgment. NORBU is eliminating the mechanical work surrounding it.
Traditional workflow
- 01Collect records
- 02Organize records
- 03Read records
- 04Build chronology
- 05Reconcile bills
- 06Draft demand
- 07Create exhibits
- 08Attorney review
NORBU workflow
- 01Upload
- 02Analyze
- 03Review
- 04Approve
- 05Export
NORBU isn't replacing attorney judgment. NORBU is eliminating the mechanical work surrounding it.
Upload
Analyze
Review
Approve
Export
Explore
The platform, layer by layer.
NORBU Demand provides analytical support for counsel. It does not determine legal value, predict settlement outcomes, or provide legal advice. Every observation is presented for attorney review.
Run the review before the demand leaves the firm.
Upload the file. NORBU reports strength, readiness and completeness for your review.